From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 14 13:16:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp011.mail.yahoo.com (smtp011.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A156E37B40A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:16:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsdq@yahoo.com) Received: from h2.impactidealsolutions.com (HELO support10) (216.98.200.91) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2001 20:16:45 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Message-Id: Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:21:14 -0600 X-Priority: 3 From: Peter X-Mailer: Mail Warrior To: james@redlinenetworks.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re:System Benchmarking/testing Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Mailer-Version: v3.57 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 06/14/2001 2:05:35 PM, James Penick is quoted as saying: >> . . .|What's a good solution for testing/burning in the CPU and Memory of a >system? I've heard 'recompile the kernel' mentioned but that doesn't seem to >efficient. Any other ideas? . I've heard of 'burning' in the car engine, but do you also need to burn in the memory/cpu?? [This is the first time I've ever heard of somethign even close to "burning" in the cpu/mem -- just curious]. Can someone also point me to a link/docs that show performance/reliability of a cpu/mem that is not "burned" in.....[if it is a good thing [tm] to burn-in cpu/mem] www.nul.cjb.net www.FreeBSD.org _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message