From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Sep  3 18:18:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA12740
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 3 Sep 1996 18:18:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA12732
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 1996 18:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.7.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id BAA07941; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 01:17:08 GMT
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 10:17:08 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: "Frank E. Terhaar-Yonkers" <fty@mcnc.org>
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: suggestion: Re: Latest Current build failure
In-Reply-To: <199609032053.QAA25476@robin.mcnc.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960904101553.7641C-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> How about a simple status report?  Like simply the CTM # and a one

It doesn't work.

3 hours later the status report is invalid.