From owner-freebsd-fs Thu Nov 2 7: 1: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5445637B4CF for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 07:01:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id QAA65867; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 16:00:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA10271; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 16:00:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 16:00:56 +0100 (CET) From: Marius Bendiksen To: Dmitry Brodsky Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hiding the lower layer in a stackable FS In-Reply-To: <200011011835.KAA04865@cascade.cs.ubc.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Is this possible??? I would still like the underlying FS to be UFS. If I understand you correctly, then I think you could do something like this: bzero( nullmp->mnt_stat.f_mntfromname, MNAMELEN ); copystr( realmp->mnt_stat.f_mntfromname, nullmp->mnt_stat.f_mntfromname, MNAMELEN - 1, &size ); That would provide a fake mount-from value. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message