Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 02:49:01 +0300 From: irix <irix@ukr.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re:altq Message-ID: <1676662227.20090518024901@ukr.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello , First of all,person who is responsible for this answer for my question about dynamics queues and finely complete to merge cdnr into pf, that altq nothing else, and complete does not this function. You need and you do. We are not interested in this. But altq is not complete solution. From altqd make any abnormality. The idea of merging with pf excellent, but the realization of an unfinished, even at 30%. Removed 70% of traffic disciplince's (like blue, JoBBs), did not finish cdnr, nothing new added. How can this be called complete project? In DfBSD in altq add fairq, is one new option in altq for last six years. No development, the project is dead. I can understand, when project is complete, more it did not need to add. But altq in pf have almost nothing. And developers say it does not concern us. So I wrote up in maillist freebsd, as in most advanced bsd system. Developers who think for a few years in advance. > On Sat, May 16, 2009 21:45, irix wrote: > Hello Freebsd-pf, > > Sorry for my english. > > OpenBSD team is abandon the altq project. > >I just got curious about this: where you heard that OpenBSD is abandoning >altq ? > >thanks, > >matheus > >-- >We will call you cygnus, >The God of balance you shall be > >A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style -- Best regards, irix mailto:irix@ukr.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1676662227.20090518024901>