From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 9 07:30:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACC816A4CE for ; Sun, 9 May 2004 07:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from coruscant.rfc1149.org (coruscant.rfc1149.org [217.160.130.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3B743D45 for ; Sun, 9 May 2004 07:30:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from schwabe@uni-paderborn.de) Received: by coruscant.rfc1149.org (Postfix, from userid 110) id 192673F54; Sun, 9 May 2004 16:30:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kamino.rfc1149.org (kamino.rfc1149.org [2001:8d8:81:11::2]) by coruscant.rfc1149.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1106B3CE7 for ; Sun, 9 May 2004 16:30:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by kamino.rfc1149.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E177E357; Sun, 9 May 2004 16:30:21 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Arne Schwabe Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 16:30:21 +0200 Message-ID: <86n04hwu4i.fsf@kamino.rfc1149.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on coruscant.rfc1149.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 May 2004 04:57:59 -0700 Subject: pkill/pgrep in base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 14:30:35 -0000 Hi, is there a reason why pkill is in the base system and pgrep is not? Arne -- Two of the most famous products of Berkeley are LSD and Unix. I don t think that this is a coincidence. --- Anonymous