From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 21:41:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3177116A4CE; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:41:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E1143D3F; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:41:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C1C5513E4; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:44:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:44:08 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20041105214408.GA32844@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <418B8CE3.9000000@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <418B8CE3.9000000@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: 5.x discussions should migrate to freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 21:41:40 -0000 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 07:23:31AM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > All, >=20 > Now that 5.3 is about to be released (really, I mean it this time!) and > 5.x is considered -STABLE, further 5.x discussions and bug reports > should migrate over to the freebsd-stable mailing list. I know that > after 4+ years, there is probably a lot of sentimental attachment to > freebsd-current, and some of you probably have never seen a branch go > stable yet, but just like watching your kids graduate and go to college, > it's time to accept that our baby has grown up =3D-) >=20 > There are already a number of differences between the two branches that > make it hard to distill bug reports (ULE and GEOM, for example), so > this should be seen as a way to help continue to stabilize 5.x and also > get ready for 6.0. Ideally, developers should subscribe to -stable so that bug reports don't fall on deaf ears. Kris --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBi/QoWry0BWjoQKURAsy0AJ0ed9bvAczmjc/VM3kxJIYbyFpolgCeMdEo V0/65tPFkpjRv6NfmlQFLiA= =iw2k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99--