Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Jul 1996 10:17:09 +0900 (JST)
From:      Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Cc:        "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Union mounts and other mounts 
Message-ID:  <Pine.SV4.3.93.960726095305.4546C-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <1028.838313231@critter.tfs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 25 Jul 1996, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <199607251559.KAA00163@dyson.iquest.net>, "John S. Dyson" writes:
> >> Terry, are you out there?
> >> 
> >> Please upload your mega patches.  I'm sure someone will take a look and
> >> maybe we can at least start with getting the locks fixed.
> >> 
> >I want to consider including Terry's stuff.  Even though I do filesystem
> >hacking from time to time, I think that we need to get agreement from
> >other's (on the team) on the changes.  The changes have significant
> >architectural implications.
> >
> >At least, in certain areas, Terry is on the right track...  We need to
> >get consensus on the changes.  The last batch of changes don't fix all
> >of the problems, and Jeffery Hsu's stuff should be reviewed and appropriately
> >included also.  I actually think that we are stagnating in this area a "little
> >bit."  But again, I don't feel qualified to make wholesale changes in that
> >(the VFS) section of the kernel, without agreement from others...  Anybody
> >have any ideas on this impasse?
> 
> I agree.
> 
> Jeff's changes have higher priority for me than Terrys, because they
> bring us closer to the codebase Kirk is hacking away on, and he has
> some nice things brewing too.

I understand that Jeff's Lite2 work needs to be incorporated before
any fs commits can be made.

I think we're a ways off from any fs commits anyway.  There's been very
little analysis on this mailing list of the direction the file systems
might be taking. 

I think its a good idea to look at the work that's been done by Terry;
identify the changes that you guys agree with; compare and contrast this
with Kirk's work when its available; and then make decisions on what to
commit.

Mike Hancock




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.960726095305.4546C-100000>