From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 31 08:20:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF6A16A4CE for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:20:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B58243D6A for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:20:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0VGKPET002352 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:20:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:20:17 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20040131.092017.22504480.imp@bsdimp.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20040131084821.GH18624@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040122090046.GH908@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20040131084821.GH18624@dragon.nuxi.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: MFS question - FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:20:43 -0000 In message: <20040131084821.GH18624@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 08:00:47PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: : > > Please DO NOT send me ANY email directly unless it's a privacy issue. : > > Reply-to mangled to assist those who don't read the above. : > : > If you want responses sent to the mailing list, you should set the : > Reply-To header to point to the mailing list rather than a random : > address. : : Yeah, right. In what email world do you live in??? : There will be at least one replier to this email that will not obey the : "Reply-To:" above. Sadly much of the automated software that's out there doesn't do this right. For example, if I hadn't taken the time to notice that there was a Reply-To field, my software would have included Peter and David... Attempts to fix this in the past have lead to frustration :-( Warner