From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Mar 25 06:13:44 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA13986
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 06:13:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from terra.Sarnoff.COM (terra.sarnoff.com [130.33.11.203])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA13961
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 06:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from rminnich@localhost) by terra.Sarnoff.COM (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA29753; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 09:12:55 -0500
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 09:12:54 -0500 (EST)
From: "Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM>
X-Sender: rminnich@terra
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: more Mac vs BSD (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970325091228.29712A-100000@terra>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

now what planet were these tests performed on?
ron

Ron Minnich                |"I would point them out but ...
rminnich@sarnoff.com       |  I have no hands." -- Coconut Monkey
(609)-734-3120             | (see CM at www.pcgamer.com/coconut.html)
ftp://ftp.sarnoff.com/pub/mnfs/www/docs/cluster.html 


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 12:10:16 GMT
To: rminnich@sarnoff.com
Subject: more Mac vs BSD

* In Apple's testing on a 10 Mbps Ethernet network, Open Transport
  could sustain throughput of 9.6 Mbps. In contrast BSD could only
  sustain 7 Mbps (and the venerable MacTCP could only do 2.3 Mbps).
  That may not sound like a huge difference, but what about a 100
  Mbps Ethernet network? Open Transport has been shown to sustain 40
  Mbps on those networks - how well will BSD do?