From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Aug 28 01:11:37 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id BAA09767
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 01:11:37 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA09759
          ; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 01:11:33 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA02285; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 01:11:27 -0700
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
cc: paul@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Dependencies 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Aug 1995 00:45:20 PDT."
             <199508280745.AAA03593@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 01:11:26 -0700
Message-ID: <2283.809597486@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> That is possible, but I thought it would be more robust to use "which"
> because we don't know if the user installed the dependency via pkg_add
> or the ports' "make install".  Note that pkg_info looks only at
> /var/db/pkg.

Shouldn't matter?  `make install' now tweaks /var/db/pkg TOO, remember?

					Jordan