From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Wed Mar 31 08:08:43 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9855BF2EE for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 08:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from forward105j.mail.yandex.net (forward105j.mail.yandex.net [5.45.198.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9JqG5bxwz4krL; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 08:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from sas1-4f6d6a97a84a.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas1-4f6d6a97a84a.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c08:f310:0:640:4f6d:6a97]) by forward105j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id CCA7EB224FD; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:08:40 +0300 (MSK) Received: from sas2-e7f6fb703652.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas2-e7f6fb703652.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c14:4fa6:0:640:e7f6:fb70]) by sas1-4f6d6a97a84a.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id FiFvZ4Lvfq-8eIOYe2d; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:08:40 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1617178120; bh=fKh1xwUBG8z208bpfCA80x+RNMzkq3Prfa4c0lNz/xs=; h=In-Reply-To:From:Date:References:To:Subject:Message-ID:Cc; b=IdVct2tU/nLAk9hrWaeBrBjcK6f1pcpcOx7aemBaB3wwrGTl1nyk8CSUvQb6eXG8+ PQ9IQRUjbdsiUsnSX5/PItZUBfRKPVktvELth0UETYUAijhwDZ+++9gcZM/mBX/mPg p506CWNNakVSa8atydoa/KY4BxnEB5ew/IRzadkA= Received: by sas2-e7f6fb703652.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id EgZUsfw7TM-8eKKgnIR; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:08:40 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) Subject: Re: Is anyone working on adding Intel Comet Lake Wi-FI support? To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Cc: freebsd-wireless References: <6c3e0a24-3e73-0c45-4da2-ddf513da7ee4@yandex.ru> From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Message-ID: <66954828-ba74-0bf9-d927-e64e0d361c3c@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:08:39 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="krimRvU5StyowExb0ys6ThvWGf7aHwI0o" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F9JqG5bxwz4krL X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 08:08:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --krimRvU5StyowExb0ys6ThvWGf7aHwI0o Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="snm0nV1PWwJAB14jqVHnQH5dW4fr6zfeK"; protected-headers="v1" From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Cc: freebsd-wireless Message-ID: <66954828-ba74-0bf9-d927-e64e0d361c3c@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: Is anyone working on adding Intel Comet Lake Wi-FI support? References: <6c3e0a24-3e73-0c45-4da2-ddf513da7ee4@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: --snm0nV1PWwJAB14jqVHnQH5dW4fr6zfeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 30.03.2021 21:34, Bjoern A. Zeeb =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> none4@pci0:0:20:3:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 class=3D0x028000 rev=3D= 0x00 hdr=3D0x00 vendor=3D0x8086 >> device=3D0x02f0 subvendor=3D0x8086 subdevice=3D0x0070 >> =C2=A0=C2=A0 vendor=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =3D 'Intel Corporation' >> =C2=A0=C2=A0 device=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =3D 'Comet Lake PCH-LP CNV= i WiFi' >> =C2=A0=C2=A0 class=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =3D network >> >> We have support for iwm9000+ support, but it seems this card has bit >> different handling in linux's iwlwifi driver. And just adding new PCI-= ID >> will not help. Is anyone working on adding support for these cards? >=20 > It's an AX201, right?=C2=A0 If so, yes.=C2=A0 I have no CNVi or AX201 t= o test > with but assumptions are it will work. >=20 > Can I get back to you mid-/end next week? Hi, sure, I'll glad to make it working :) --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --snm0nV1PWwJAB14jqVHnQH5dW4fr6zfeK-- --krimRvU5StyowExb0ys6ThvWGf7aHwI0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEE5lkeG0HaFRbwybwAAcXqBBDIoXoFAmBkLgcFAwAAAAAACgkQAcXqBBDIoXrS 3wgAmx/JGq8IpQnqmRdMBegH526C4KWDGMdZ7007JF08aQrtB4RQI03i1pV1HT7vJByfbDD7FLIM xukIFdrudBDigJ5PhIewQJS9TURqVhftHr5ZOwcQLYM12uaZ5p51LUxnVT2NtzgzuHbqcS2qzR/d 11tYdAe/S3PetZNodDNvz9txri9Bgao7NrQHZ6eP1b/gjorO7ENYngnGcbKTzt/avVFWIqaTYiRo KX2UqrdCExnpnR3sIemdr61v26sKc6WXztuhwcpBbDE9y0KuTN2l9T2EcCMw/LvMeIyu+yUzVKPL rGt+eX6Gjo/Shja2iCZOzt9bg5NBVuvGAwNennOkiw== =eBTH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --krimRvU5StyowExb0ys6ThvWGf7aHwI0o--