From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Tue Sep 19 10:05:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17ECFE0A0D1 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06F9B7564C for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v8JA58rB043977 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:05:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222288] g_bio leak after zfs ABD commit Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:05:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: borjam@sarenet.es X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: avg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:05:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222288 Borja Marcos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |borjam@sarenet.es --- Comment #5 from Borja Marcos --- I've applied the second patch. Seems to be working fine, no leaks. Only one thing has me slightly puzzled, a very high used UMA slabs count. ITEM SIZE LIMIT USED FREE REQ FAIL SLEEP UMA Kegs: 384, 0, 242, 8, 242, 0, 0 UMA Zones: 4736, 0, 259, 0, 259, 0, 0 UMA Slabs: 80, 0, 542261, 39, 553319, 0, 0 UMA Hash: 256, 0, 60, 60, 109, 0, 0 The other server running Elasticsearch, which is still on 11.1-RELEASE and = has also 8 GB of memory, shows this. Note the high number of free UMA slabs. ITEM SIZE LIMIT USED FREE REQ FAIL SLEEP UMA Kegs: 384, 0, 240, 0, 240, 0, 0 UMA Zones: 2176, 0, 257, 0, 257, 0, 0 UMA Slabs: 80, 0, 207526, 243674, 2339176, 0, 0 I'll let it run for several days anyway. As I said it's not critical. Thanks! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=