From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 05:33:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5430E16A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 05:33:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E833E43D1D for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 05:33:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (spamrefuse@yahoo.com) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004110914:33:26:548090.17416.2906323888 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:33:26 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <419056B1.1060102@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:33:37 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041017 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: YES-__TRSYS_LV__3 (SR:-4.70) (SRN:SPAMROBOT) ----------------- Subject: FAST_IPSEC & INET6: kernel compiles, but is it dangerous? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 05:33:44 -0000 Hi, When I do a mailinglist search and a google on FAST_IPSEC and INET6 with 5.3, I get quite some results that say: the kernel compilation will fail, because FAST_IPSEC requires exclusion of INET6. I'm running 5.3-STABLE, and I have compiled a kernel with FAST_IPSEC and INET6; this compiles fine, and the kernel boots OK. Am I doing something dangerous here? Or meanwhile has the FAST_IPSEC vs. INET6 conflict been resolved? Thanks, Rob.