From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 1 15:10:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D9E37B401 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lily.ezo.net (nsc.ezo.net [68.23.200.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373A843F75 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:10:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jflowers@ezo.net) Received: from www.ezo.net (peony.ezo.net [68.23.200.11]) by lily.ezo.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h71MB1Bj071451 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 18:11:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jflowers@ezo.net) From: "Jim Flowers" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 17:12:12 -0500 Message-Id: <20030801200146.M43710@ezo.net> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 1.90 20030310 X-OriginatingIP: 68.23.200.27 (jflowers) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: RE: no arp who-has replys X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 22:10:57 -0000 OK, I found it right after I sent this. There is a sysctl switch called net.link.ether.inet.proxyall (off by default) that enables it. -------------------original message ... My understanding is that when a router knows a route to an ip address, it is supposed to respond to arp who-has messages with an arp reply message giving its own mac address. The fbsd router is not responding even though it has a correct route, has ip forwarding enabled and is seeing the arp who-has messages. Shouldn't it be? -- Jim Flowers