From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 14 10:27:39 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24151065679
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:27:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7F98FC17
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:27:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org>) id 1QhJ8s-0005qy-2G
	for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:38 +0200
Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:38 +0200
Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:38 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:25 +0200
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <ivmgad$h72$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <1309217450.43651.YahooMailRC@web120014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>	<20110628010822.GA41399@icarus.home.lan>
	<CADLo838uyJYK9_HpWFm_5vuXaihm5fca+xvay73EeYen+uw2Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6
In-Reply-To: <CADLo838uyJYK9_HpWFm_5vuXaihm5fca+xvay73EeYen+uw2Ng@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Subject: Re: Improving old-fashioned UFS2 performance with lots of inodes...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:27:40 -0000

On 12/07/2011 16:06, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 28 June 2011 02:08, Jeremy Chadwick<freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>  wrote:
>>
>> On what exact OS version?  Please don't say "8.2", need to know
>> 8.2-RELEASE, -STABLE, or what.  You said "8.x" above, which is too
>> vague.  If 8.2-STABLE you should not be tuning vm.kmem_size_max at all,
>> and you probably don't need to tune vm.kmem_size either.
>
> We don't do 8.2-STABLE, it's 8-STABLE....

Yeah, but colloquially "8.2-STABLE" means "8-STABLE in between 8.2 and 
8.3 releases"... it's not a new thing.