Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:31:37 +0100 From: Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bug-buddy for freebsd-gnome Message-ID: <20061125183137.5bc2edb7.jylefort@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1164447271.60976.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20061125095820.I12918@pukruppa.net> <1164447271.60976.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Sat__25_Nov_2006_18_31_38_+0100_Gn8.LYLjAw1JHhM4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 04:34:31 -0500 Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 10:12 +0100, P.U.Kruppa wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am tracking gnome devel branch for some time now, and wonder if > > it would make sense to change bug-buddy so that backtraces > > and system infos aren't sent to gnome developers directly but to > > the freebsd-gnome project. > > We would actually prefer you set GNOME_DISABLE_CRASH_DIALOG=1 in your > environment to disable bug-buddy altogether. This will cause processes > to dump core, and allows for more useful backtraces. And file bug reports on bugzilla.gnome.org; a majority of GNOME bugs are not OS-specific. -- Jean-Yves Lefort jylefort@FreeBSD.org http://lefort.be.eu.org/ --Signature=_Sat__25_Nov_2006_18_31_38_+0100_Gn8.LYLjAw1JHhM4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFaH36yzD7UaO4AGoRAq4qAJ9PRbstKMjSE81z1TEpA0vxYfV/ZgCfVE56 24jl7uJnFfjRC+r63leHclM= =32zB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__25_Nov_2006_18_31_38_+0100_Gn8.LYLjAw1JHhM4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061125183137.5bc2edb7.jylefort>