From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 18 15:48:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5543216A514 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:48:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F360C43D66 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:48:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5IFjaVu050546; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:45:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:45:54 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040618.094554.06947940.imp@bsdimp.com> To: silby@silby.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20040618014912.O72823@odysseus.silby.com> References: <7071.208.178.23.220.1087509793.squirrel@208.178.23.220> <20040618063319.GB17749@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20040618014912.O72823@odysseus.silby.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: alfred@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU cc: fjoe@samodelkin.net Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys mbuf.h src/sys/kern uipc_mbuf.c uipc_syscalls.c src/usr.bin/netstat mbuf.c src/lib/libc/sys sendfile.2 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:48:16 -0000 In message: <20040618014912.O72823@odysseus.silby.com> Mike Silbersack writes: : My opinion is based on the fact that software in contrib/ and in ports/ : can change greatly from version to version, yet I'm getting attacked : because I added a few lines of extra information to a utility. Something else changed, therefore all change is fair game is not logical. You are arguing to be right, rather than arguing for what's right for the project. This little change isn't worth the push back you are giving to the folks that rightly point out that it changes things in -stable more than is traditional. Warner