From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov  9 09:27:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AED216A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 Nov 2004 09:27:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B69E43D54
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 Nov 2004 09:27:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from andre@freebsd.org)
Received: (qmail 35975 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2004 09:22:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.53])
          (envelope-sender <andre@freebsd.org>)
          by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <mallman@icir.org>; 9 Nov 2004 09:22:42 -0000
Message-ID: <41908D80.8EAEF656@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:27:28 +0100
From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mallman@icir.org
References: <20041109035203.9ED891FB5E2@lawyers.icir.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 09:27:29 -0000

Mark Allman wrote:
> 
> (catching up ...)
> 
> > I would rather have Andre work with me to get any other
> > rinkles out of SCTP that he deems are there... and get the
> > KAME-SCTP stack ported directly in to FreeBSD.. this IMO ... would
> > make more sense... Get something that is pretty well baked (IMO at
> > least) and work to get it "productionized" (even though I don't
> > feel it needs much work in this vein)...
> 
> I do not prefer xor.
> 
> I agree that it'd be nice if SCTP was rolled into freebsd.  But, these
> things seem orthogonal to me.

The author of the BSD SCTP code is working on a direct FreeBSD native
port (no KAME detour to take).

-- 
Andre