Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 01:24:20 +0000 From: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: so much clock interrupts?! Message-ID: <200511260124.22384.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <20051125064503.GA707@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> References: <20051124013438.T8326@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051124204359.GD30073@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051125064503.GA707@bsd.trippelsdorf.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 25 November 2005 06:45, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > 2000 interrupts per second per core for the timer is a > ridiculous high number and I reduce it simply for aesthetic reasons. > This may be a religious issue and everyone should use what he or she > seems fitting. If you think in a wider perspective, and consider the number of cpu cycles per interrupt on historical and embedded cpus, 2000 Hz is pretty conservative.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511260124.22384.list-freebsd-2004>