From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 5 21:37:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA18403 for current-outgoing; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 21:37:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from word.smith.net.au (vh1.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA18392 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 21:37:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.gsoft.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA01399; Thu, 6 Nov 1997 16:03:44 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199711060533.QAA01399@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Greg Lehey cc: FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: Kernel build fails: missing card.h In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Nov 1997 14:55:44 +1030." <19971106145544.65346@lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 06 Nov 1997 16:03:43 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > On Thu, Nov 06, 1997 at 01:52:47PM +1030, Mike Smith wrote: > >>> > >>> Did you update your kernel crd->card, > >> > >> Why do I need this? Anyway, I tried, and it didn't go away. > > > > Because the 'crd' device was renamed 'card'? > > Well, why do I need crd or card? I thought that was only for PCMCIA > and PPCARD stuff. It is. It wasn't clear which part of your ass you had left uncovered; you don't need the 'card' device in your kernel, but it wasn't clear whether you had the old 'crd' one there or not. If you had, you would have seen similar symptoms under some circumstances. > > And sys/conf/files? Does it contain : > > > > pccard/pccard.c optional card > > pccard/pccard_beep.c optional card > > That's the one. It wasn't getting updated because it still had my > ISDN stuff in it. But this doesn't explain why I suddenly need > PCCARD in a desktop machine. You don't. How long have you been building BSD kernels? Do I really have to explain this to *you*??? Mind-boggling you what. mike