From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 13 18:57:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA03456 for current-outgoing; Tue, 13 May 1997 18:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA03440 for ; Tue, 13 May 1997 18:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) id LAA19937; Wed, 14 May 1997 11:27:05 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199705140157.LAA19937@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: Excessive tty-level buffer overflows In-Reply-To: <199705121325.IAA03059@zuhause.mn.org> from Bruce Albrecht at "May 12, 97 08:25:25 am" To: bruce@zuhause.mn.org (Bruce Albrecht) Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 11:27:04 +0930 (CST) Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Bruce Albrecht stands accused of saying: > Michael Smith writes: > > Not necesarily; do you nice your builds around? It's possible that the > > UUCP job was simply starved for CPU. > > I'm running on a Pentium Pro, I'd like to think that it should be up > to the task. However, I often see these error messages even when the only > thing running is uucp. Ok, so it's not likely to be load related. Does your modem perhaps emit a rash of line noise when the other party hangs up? Does the error coincide with any protocol lossage? Does it occur in the middle of conversations, or at one end or the other? -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[