From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr  4 21:07:32 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA02007 for current-outgoing; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 21:07:32 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id VAA01995; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 21:07:30 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams)
cc: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth), current@FreeBSD.org,
        rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, nate@trout.sri.mt.net
Subject: Re: NOTICE: If you care, speak now! 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Apr 95 20:39:14 MDT."
             <199504050239.UAA08889@trout.sri.MT.net> 
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 1995 21:07:30 -0700
Message-ID: <1993.797054850@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Okay, my response is:
> 
> Not now.  After 2.1 is released.

Since it's *never* a good time to do these things, I'll be more flexible:

1. Do what I requested before and bring the entire system up on a public test
   box, first.  Let us all do a few make worlds and examine it.

2. If it looks really good and doesn't break things significantly, I say go for it.

My reasoning is that 2.1's make brokenness is already pretty well
known, and if it's easier to switch horses than give the old one I've
got a face-lift, then I'm interested.  It's that comparison that I'm
waiting to now see with my own eyes.

						Jordan