From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 30 15:52:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE4116A4BF for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ECB43FD7 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:52:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158])h7UMoUxk005073; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:50:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) h7UMpZff016037; Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:51:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Glenn Johnson In-Reply-To: <20030829224554.GA95841@node1.cluster.srrc.usda.gov> References: <20030829224554.GA95841@node1.cluster.srrc.usda.gov> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3pPS3C645Knx0us0mAX8" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1062283953.20426.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:52:33 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_XIMIAN autolearn=ham version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: acme in notification area hogging CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 22:52:39 -0000 --=-3pPS3C645Knx0us0mAX8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 18:45, Glenn Johnson wrote: > This just started a couple of days ago and I am seeing it on both my > home machine and work machine. I have acme set to start at session > startup and I have the "Notification Area" enabled on the panel. So > there is a little icon in the notification area for acme. Upon initial > gnome session startup acme, panel, and notification are all using as > many CPU cycles as they can. This condition will persist until I click > on the acme icon in the notification area. Then the CPU usage goes down > to essentially zero for acme, panel, and notification. I do not have to > open acme, just click on the icon. >=20 > If I do not have the notification area enabled and acme starting at > session startup, then the acme and panel CPU utilization is normal. If > I have the notification area enabled and acme *not* start at session > startup, then the panel and notification CPU utilization is normal. >=20 > If I load acme after gnome has started up (with notification area > enabled), CPU utilization is normal for acme, panel, and notification. >=20 > High CPU utilization only happens when acme puts the icon in the > notification area at session startup. What changed between when it was good, and now? Have you looked at the spinning process to see what it might be spinning on? Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-3pPS3C645Knx0us0mAX8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/USqxb2iPiv4Uz4cRAl/+AJ9Jd+zyC6N4FxBxkGi2t3DtMZ97awCgrgi8 0EyL5XrPiBT/FT1j0ULaNaY= =iGbX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3pPS3C645Knx0us0mAX8--