From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 13:42:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5E616A4B3 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from paladin.fortunaty.net (fortunaty.net [217.160.129.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACAD343F85 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:42:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ah@paladin.fortunaty.net) Received: (qmail 24634 invoked by uid 501); 22 Oct 2003 20:42:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:42:00 +0200 From: Andy To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031022204200.GC14012@splashground.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <1066789354.21430.39.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031022082953.GA69506@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1066816287.25609.34.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031022095754.GA70026@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1066820436.25609.93.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031022144043.GI55642@dan.emsphone.com> <20031022155058.GE3640@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031022155058.GE3640@saboteur.dek.spc.org> X-Addicted: yeah X-License: BSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:42:03 -0000 On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 04:50:58PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:40:44AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > The actual commit quote reads: > > > > > > "use a red-black tree to find entries in the vm_map. augment the > > > red-black tree to find free space between entries. speeds up memory > > > allocation, etc..." > > > > > > I am wondering if there is a compelling reason why the technique used > > > by OpenBSD could not be adapted to FreeBSD's VM system. > > > > Probably just a case of "too much to do and not enough people to do > > it". FreeBSD already has sys/tree.h, which provides the red-black tree > > macros. > > Now accepting patches! You might want to have a look at fefe's research before you take the OpenBSD way. http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/ aha