From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Aug 13 10:48:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from pawn.primelocation.net (pawn.primelocation.net [205.161.238.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F15737B581 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 10:48:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cdf.lists@fxp.org) Received: by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix, from userid 1016) id B10379B05; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 13:48:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A587CBA11; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 13:48:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 13:48:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Chris D. Faulhaber" X-Sender: cdf.lists@pawn.primelocation.net To: Leif Neland Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2 inetd's with 2 nics In-Reply-To: <004401c00543$50c661a0$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Leif Neland wrote: > Is it possible and a good idea to have one inetd for the inside nic and > another with fewer services for the outside on a gateway machine, > or should I just use ipfw/ipchain for this? > Depends on why you want them separate. You could use the -a option to run separate instances or use tcp_wrappers (integrated in inetd), ipf, or ipfw to limit acccess. ----- Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message