From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 12 23:12:36 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CCF16A419
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:12:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0F613C4D3
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:12:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192)
	id 557621A4D80; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:11:47 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:11:47 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
Message-ID: <20071212231147.GA61429@elvis.mu.org>
References: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org>
	<20071212180910.H75212@niwun.pair.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071212180910.H75212@niwun.pair.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
	Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Subject: Re: bikeshed for all!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:12:36 -0000

* Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> [071212 15:09] wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> >So, I'm playing with some multiple routing table support..
> >the first version is a minimal impact version with very limited 
> >functionality.
> >It's done that way so I can put it in RELENG_6/7 without breaking ABIs (I 
> >hope).
> >Later there will be a more flexible version for-current.
> >
> >Here's the question..
> >
> >I need a word to use to describe the network view one is currently on..
> >e.g. if you are usinghe second routing table, you could say I've set xxx 
> >to 1
> >(0 based)..
> 
> In the spirit of your subject, why not call them 'sheds'?

Because it's horrible. :)

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein