From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 14:29:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A80E16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:29:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0EE43D49 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i61ET1aI004307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:29:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i61ESOUi039023 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:28:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i61ESNFs011317; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:28:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i61ESNRo011316; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:28:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:28:23 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: Alex K Message-ID: <20040701142822.GC57889@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <200406301904.44292.lesha@intercaf.ru> <20040701123615.GA57889@cicely12.cicely.de> <200407011805.55432.lesha@intercaf.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407011805.55432.lesha@intercaf.ru> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de cc: ticso@cicely.de cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uplcom.c changes (was: USB driver selection algorithm?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:29:33 -0000 On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 06:05:55PM +0400, Alex K wrote: > > Hello! > > Bernd Walter wrote: > > uplcom takes devices (or maybe interfaces) based on vendor/product ID. > > > > > What approach will you recommend? > > > > What is your problem? > 2 different USB devices with same vendor/product ID, only revision differes. > They both will be handeled by uplcom, but initialization should be different, > because chips are different (PL2303 and PL2303X) Ah - so it's a matter of expanding our uplcom driver. I will check the linux driver and try to find out what the differences are. I asume you have test hardware? -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de