From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 14:31:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE7816A4CE for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:31:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A68F143D41 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:31:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 85862 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Feb 2004 22:31:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.4.1.17?) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 13 Feb 2004 22:31:18 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:31:49 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long X-X-Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.home To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: <200402132136.i1DLaYii065621@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20040213152836.U25703@pooker.samsco.home> References: <200402132136.i1DLaYii065621@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/bfe if_bfe.c if_bfereg.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:31:21 -0000 On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > julian 2004/02/13 13:36:34 PST > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > sys/dev/bfe if_bfe.c if_bfereg.h > Log: > Upgrade to the version of the MFC by Edwin Groothuis. > This seems to work but I have heard of hangs... > > Revision Changes Path > 1.4.4.3 +101 -91 src/sys/dev/bfe/if_bfe.c > 1.1.4.3 +12 -0 src/sys/dev/bfe/if_bfereg.h > > Julian, Are you willing to stand by this commit? Your comment implies that you don't know if it works or not. If so, then RELENG_4 is certainly not the place for this. Mr. Groothuis might have done a fine job with this, but unless you as a committer and senior member of this project are willing to actually review, test, and validate it, then it needs to be backed out and revisited at a later date. Scott