From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 6 02:22:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0A016A42A for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 02:22:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB6643D45 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 02:22:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EjST6-0004dt-IQ for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 03:22:12 +0100 Received: from murdoc.gwi.net ([207.5.142.8]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 03:22:12 +0100 Received: from jcoombs by murdoc.gwi.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 03:22:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: "Joshua Coombs" Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 21:20:28 -0500 Lines: 8 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: murdoc.gwi.net X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Sender: news Subject: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 02:22:36 -0000 #options ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable? The idea of avoiding memory copies when possible seems really appealing for my 386, on which any little boost is significant. : ) Joshua Coombs