From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 1 15:57:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E186916A41F; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:57:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A44A43D48; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:57:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [70.30.70.180]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805311A3C22; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 08:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 92FDF5130A; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 11:57:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 11:57:52 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Chris Message-ID: <20051001155752.GD64006@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051001085358.GA62022@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20051001154628.GA64006@xor.obsecurity.org> <433EB047.4070809@makeworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <433EB047.4070809@makeworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: scottl@freebsd.org, FreeBSD - Questions , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 6.0R todo list - hash sizes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:57:54 -0000 --zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:50:31AM -0500, Chris wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > >=20 > >>Hi, > >> > >>scottl@ removed: > >> Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small > >> hash size that causes significant performance penalties. > >> > >>this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any com= mits > >>to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed th= en? > >=20 > >=20 > > It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not > > the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago. > >=20 > > Kris > >=20 >=20 > Somewhat off topic - what's the status of 6.0? The info on > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/schedule.html > Has not been updated in some time and we're still on Beta5 The status is that we're still on beta5, and the bugs listed in the todo list need to be fixed. Kris --zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDPrH/Wry0BWjoQKURAu2sAJ9NltS4hncvQbTnno9A6TvYRvXYcgCfdrka 0xrNqcx0IwmCxz3nho7o8ro= =sutM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi--