From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Apr 30 19:46:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA02105 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 19:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA02079 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 19:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id LAA06552 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 11:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA02337; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 10:58:27 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199704301758.KAA02337@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: why general protection fault happen on SMP kernel? To: shiba@mxs.meshnet.or.jp (SHIBA) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 10:58:27 -0700 (MST) Cc: vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu, smp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "SHIBA" at Apr 30, 97 01:07:35 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Kevin> Try running your 180's at 180, and see if you still get the GPF. > > thanks, > 180--->200 (233->200 ;_;) > OK. > > but kernel execute on 233MHz before Apr. 20 (about) When's the official start of summer in your neck of the woods? 8-). Could be ambient temperature is up... so the same cooling is less effective. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.