From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jun 26 23:30:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C7B37BE45 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:30:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA72497; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:30:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id AAA32078; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:28:17 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200006270628.AAA32078@harmony.village.org> To: Matt Heckaman Subject: Re: Compatibility Question Cc: Brad Knowles , FreeBSD-STABLE In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Jun 2000 07:42:50 EDT." References: Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:28:17 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Matt Heckaman writes: : comparison to some, but I have a machine here running 512M of non-ECC for : over a year now without any ram-related problems. (HD did die once though) Without any ram-related problems that were detected you mean. without ECC or parity, you may have some that go undetected... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message