From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 16 01:15:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2B716A4CF; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FF243D31; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:15:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i3G8Faui085707; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:15:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.9/8.12.3/Submit) id i3G8FagW085706; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:15:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:15:35 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20040416081535.GB84377@abigail.blackend.org> References: <200404141231.i3ECVgnb037966@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040415105223.GA771@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20040415205623.GA46098@abigail.blackend.org> <20040416033747.GA16273@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040416033747.GA16273@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE cc: "Simon L. Nielsen" cc: freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs article.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 08:15:45 -0000 On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:37:47PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > To be honest with you given the ports/ section of the FTP site is > probably an order of magnitude larger than the next largest thing and > tends to have a life of its own we might be best off just putting a > date there instead of an OS revision. The CVS repository is probably > the same - ports dwarfs the mainline system, and gnats/mailing-lists > dwarfs ports. :-) > > If you agree I can revise the numbers to current estimates and put > in "(as of April 2004)". > You have more knowledge than me on this point, I think you should take care of it :) Marc