From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jul 24 2:44:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gateh.kw.bbc.co.uk (gateh.kw.bbc.co.uk [132.185.132.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE8937B6B6 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 02:44:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matthew.bayliss.01@bbc.co.uk) Received: from w12wcxi03.wc.bbc.co.uk (w12wcxi03.wc.bbc.co.uk [132.185.49.99]) by gateh.kw.bbc.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA17962 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:44:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from w1bhxi01.radio.bbc.co.uk (unverified) by w12wcxi03.wc.bbc.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:43:58 +0100 Received: by w1bhxi01.radio.bbc.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:43:57 +0100 Message-Id: <01B7949A559DD111A1F40000F8CB2D88014549D0@midbirmxu01.bm.bbc.co.uk> From: Matthew Bayliss-N3D To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: CVSup and Ports Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:43:49 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there any alternative way to update my sources than the CVSup method? Like perhaps a tarball of updated sources or port skeletons. The problem is that unless I have access through a firewall I can't update, surely I can't be the only one who has experienced this so there must be an alternative. Cheers, Matt This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message