From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 19 13:58:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D503D16A4CE for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:58:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail4.speakeasy.net (mail4.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFEF43D31 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:58:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 15379 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2004 13:58:27 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.no-ip.com) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 19 Sep 2004 13:58:27 -0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id D54F5E; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:58:26 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Andy Smith References: <20040918004111.GA73323@caffreys.strugglers.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 19 Sep 2004 09:58:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20040918004111.GA73323@caffreys.strugglers.net> Message-ID: <44wtyqz7gd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: /var/db/pkg/cups-base-1.1.20.0/+CONTENTS: No such file or directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:58:27 -0000 Andy Smith writes: > Hi folks, > > I don't know what I have done to cause this, but now every use of > the various portutils results in this message: > > /var/db/pkg/cups-base-1.1.20.0/+CONTENTS: No such file or directory > > That files does indeed not exist, althoug the directory does and the > port is installed. > > Based on googling I have tried running pkgdb -F and portsdb -u, but > it doesn't help. Both run without error. > > Does anyone have any ideas? Force a reinstall of that package? The ports tools are indeed going to have a lot of problems if your package database is incomplete like that...