From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 15:52:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C06D16A4CE for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:52:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail5.speakeasy.net (mail5.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7F943D53 for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:52:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 28963 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2004 15:52:41 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Dec 2004 15:52:41 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id EB72D43; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:52:40 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Michael R. Wayne" References: <200412030804.iB3845O7039665@manor.msen.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 03 Dec 2004 10:52:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200412030804.iB3845O7039665@manor.msen.com> Message-ID: <44oehbe5vb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 130 minute telnet timeout? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:52:45 -0000 "Michael R. Wayne" writes: > Trying to use a portmaster as a reverse console server. If I do > date ; telnet portmaster ; date > and connect to a port, the connection stays up for 2 hours and > 10 minutes, then gets > Connection closed by foreign host. > > Given this, I suspected the portmaster. But other people do not > see the problem. Today, I tried a telnet from a Windows box and > it stayed up for over 4 hours (at which point I killed it). > > So, this suggests that FreeBSD 4.x is doing something. A quick > browse through the source code for telnet does not suggest anything. > Any ideas? There is no NAT involved. TCP keepalives?