From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 20 20:49:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54CF16A41F for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:49:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DF243D48 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:49:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a084.otenet.gr [212.205.215.84]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j6KKngHL026778; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:49:43 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6KKnbIW002541; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:49:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6KKnaDP002540; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:49:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:49:33 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: "Constantine A. Murenin" Message-ID: <20050720204932.GA2487@gothmog.gr> References: <42DCC503.5000408@ludd.ltu.se> <20050719213356.GA1614@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:42:31 +0000 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Joachim Str?mbergson Subject: Re: Adding OpenBSD sudo to the FreeBSD base system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:49:46 -0000 On 2005-07-20 16:32, "Constantine A. Murenin" wrote: >On 19/07/05, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2005-07-19 11:16, Joachim Str?mbergson wrote: >>> >>> My thought was to sync/import the sudo implementation from OpenBSD. Bad >>> idea? >> >> Maybe not so bad if the OpenBSD version of sudo has useful enhancements >> of any sort (i.e. has gone through a thorough security audit, or it >> includes features that are not available through the Ports version, >> or if the OpenBSD sudo uses a BSD and not an ISC-style license). > > : > > The ISC copyright is functionally equivalent to a two-term BSD copyright with language removed that is made unnecessary by the Berne convention. This is the preferred license for new code incorporated into OpenBSD. A sample license is included in the source tree as /usr/src/share/misc/license.template. > > What's the reason that you'd prefer a BSD-licence over ISC-style licence? The reason was I happened to be behind a very slow connection when I replied and had not checked the license myself yet. Thanks for the clarification though. I've already looked at: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/sudo/LICENSE Thanks, Giorgos