From owner-freebsd-arch  Tue Jul 11  8:39:50 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4A9FA37B988; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from itojun@itojun.org)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/smtpfeed 1.06) with ESMTP id AAA05864;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:39:41 +0900 (JST)
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org,
	Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org>
In-reply-to: kris's message of Tue, 11 Jul 2000 03:56:15 MST.
      <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007110343110.87454-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: Merge of KAME code
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:39:41 +0900
Message-ID: <5862.963329981@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


>With the exception of the rcmd_af() bug found by Peter, and missing
>functionality in IPv6 multicast (see recent post to -net by itojun) I
>haven't heard of any problems with the new code.

	it's already in the main trunc.  sys/net/if_ethersubr.c revision 1.79.

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message