Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:05:52 -0700 From: John Merryweather Cooper <johnmary@adelphia.net> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: Port FreeBSD <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/69118: [MAINTAINER-UPDATE] Patch x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp to 1.0_1 Message-ID: <1089929151.34614.25.camel@68-169-191-150.losaca.adelphia.net> In-Reply-To: <200407152150.i6FLoIQt011985@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200407152150.i6FLoIQt011985@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-aPnJVVAA+sn9gLmr6QbR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 14:50, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/69118; it has been noted by GNAT= S. >=20 > From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> > To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, johnmary@adelphia.net > Cc: =20 > Subject: Re: ports/69118: [MAINTAINER-UPDATE] Patch x11-toolkits/gtk-shar= p to 1.0_1 > Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:47:39 -0500 >=20 > Ouch, it is not pretty for have the hardcore stuff.. Umm, can you point = on =20 > something like libgtk-x11-2.0.so instead libgtk-x11-2.0.so.400? This wil= l =20 > help for no conflict with the GNOME 2.7/2.8. The libgtk-x11-2.0.so is ju= st =20 > a symlink that point on libgtk-x11-2.0.so.400. > =20 > -libgdk-x11-2.0@LIB_PREFIX@.400@LIB_SUFFIX@ > +libgdk-x11-2.0@LIB_PREFIX@@LIB_SUFFIX@ > =20 > Will this work and any thought? I am not even sure if I am right or wron= g, =20 > so I will leave that to the other committers. :-) > =20 > Cheers, > Mezz > =20 >=20 > --=20 > mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org > FreeBSD GNOME Team > http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org In principle, you could, but I don't think it saves you very much.=20 Unless gtk-sharp itself adopts a more stable means of determining the shared object names (actually, for gtkhtml-3 it does O.K.--for some reason they treated this library special) either the maintainer (me) or a Gnome committer is going to have to hack the XML each time to remove the hard-coded ABI numbers. I don't think it's much of a "win" either way. jmc --=-aPnJVVAA+sn9gLmr6QbR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBA9v+/vBSBfjNhsrIRAkcYAJ4mc+/0oQG/AsVgRBAQlIA5IeRvlACgiWuC oQvuSop/8nJBm5NaVZQsn3E= =qGZe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-aPnJVVAA+sn9gLmr6QbR--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1089929151.34614.25.camel>