From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 30 21:59:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from pop3-3.enteract.com (pop3-3.enteract.com [207.229.143.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA24E155D6 for ; Sun, 30 May 1999 21:59:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Received: (qmail 71003 invoked from network); 31 May 1999 06:00:13 -0000 Received: from shell-2.enteract.com (dscheidt@207.229.143.41) by pop3-3.enteract.com with SMTP; 31 May 1999 06:00:13 -0000 Received: from localhost (dscheidt@localhost) by shell-2.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with SMTP id XAA35969; Sun, 30 May 1999 23:59:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell-2.enteract.com: dscheidt owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 23:59:10 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt To: Bill Huey Cc: Matthew Hunt , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel config script In-Reply-To: <199905310428.VAA29154@mag.ucsd.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 30 May 1999, Bill Huey wrote: > That's fundamentally disturbing especially coming from other fellow > Unix variant folks. > Inter-UNIX rivalries are one of things that has kept unix healthy for so long. Linux tends to pick up most of the 3L1t3 dudez, who don't know anything but how to follow a How-To. I don't have a problem with letting someone else deal with annoying lusers. When they get a clue, and realize that FreeBSD has substantial advantages over Linux, then we can deal with them. It would be nice if there were some migration documentation. (And yes, that *is* an offer. Who do I talk to?) Someone used to have a .sig that summed the difference between Linux and *BSD pretty nicely: "Linux is for people that hate Microsoft. FreeBSD is for people who love Unix." David Scheidt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message