From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 7 18:34:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD4C1065674 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 18:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [80.249.188.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B387D8FC12 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 18:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desktop.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (85-142-52-164.well-com.net [85.142.52.164]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by ftp.translate.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8BAD613DF42; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 22:34:18 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 22:34:09 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <996272643.20100707223409@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Martin Matuska , freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <4C31C71C.2010606@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: [CFT] ZFS v15 patch (version 3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:34:21 -0000 Hello, . You wrote 7 =E8=FE=EB=FF 2010 =E3., 22:25:20: > If the target is FreeBSD 9 instead of 8.1, why not merge ZFS v19? 15 > really doesn't give any major enhancements over 14 and FreeBSD 9 isn't > coming out any time. > 19 would give much need log device removal and triple parity RAID-Z. > Both of which are well tested at this point via OpenSolaris. Is here any ZFS history, in "date - pool version - new features" format? I understand, that it is more solaris-specific question, but I can not formulate request for Google to find out answer by myself :( --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov