From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Nov 9 16:24:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AC5E5516F for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:24:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E6F6E179 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:24:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0E51EE5516E; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:24:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF74E5516D for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:24:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C981F6E178 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:24:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id q126so5746851ywq.10 for ; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 08:24:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nuxi-nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=d4XoQpqlSsS634XKy2LlGv3z/qQYSIjOt8aIdFsRkJE=; b=FebDiGFO9Y5/fLvRiyHfKlxo7Ypi9/iUDjuICoXy8Nt1twRWaVKod+ZAe6jk/0lpEd y97SDTmf8oo0eQG4ZPZCmZBjgT9niPhdq7usFdtZ80H1Y4CAORGy30qPfMpZzlWL8cZF 6MP6cVO3Rke7Ie6a7Qg/RfDyBgSAwE/A7TM6EXzVf/+mi1zDF+DGigXpx0ggyTL92LKD Re7gpDz1nfzaePOQRF2tFjRALxoSkPPYud+Q4ikUbJx7m26wmnrO8qE6iyYUbR5+3bfD 4+aVwJ7Gio2K3RCYkF/h/EmhW1PIXVQM5oJFn0CaXi5rTkrAaFqJqdx7/u4GMJnLxjAD 0ucw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=d4XoQpqlSsS634XKy2LlGv3z/qQYSIjOt8aIdFsRkJE=; b=K5kpxeif2oGmq7k0wrTg3jcPO2pWW0SeF3jCfOfT/GEgcOt+kQ1CaXcjIriePPNoYn K8qJkaTqGOrRGUcziDiCkJNVzEutsIGzQr4lIeHYKStCUQzz5tuxSzli7ne0LtxDvBYQ Vu5qPHnt5kxRouW5x/7mm/LM0lISnuvTN3sGKnhCNUmP9cfxB1sZFwxvYZSu4XW6Kgcs 1wgFEftNUBmBHZWIPdqHVe7AB3q5nujhuenbf8eh0KVEd7vQ1h5v5s9uxVMS9p2X5IyC IT5szovcMTbWA5fitDuCcfr8Rk6OBagJIWEjcIWuZqvsw0bFVB43cKR/bLkmCJjJni8T C01g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4ZzkUNCGZTxy/vCZGpzNRmWHSSPebNMC9n0Y5hMw9J/icjIN5b B77oapG7wVK6Acsg9Kc6zfarZT+lEkE7nC+fINREYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZQKddBrX2ZIaCfHBs1UsisyC2rVnEJToun0W6DrQpdrvw2HonQWpRM17qpwbY9kOXNxJlPRPuHEHdHuVotXEQ= X-Received: by 10.37.129.142 with SMTP id p14mr733611ybk.273.1510244655684; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 08:24:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.41.68 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 08:23:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20171109135221.GB4550@kib.kiev.ua> References: <20171109135221.GB4550@kib.kiev.ua> From: Ed Schouten Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 17:23:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: XBOX/i386 and xlint removal To: Konstantin Belousov Cc: current@freebsd.org, rink@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:24:17 -0000 [ +rink@ for XBOX/i386 ] 2017-11-09 14:52 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Belousov : > Hello, > I created two reviews to axe two features which I personally find of > little use in modern FreeBSD. > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13015 xlint > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13016 XBOX/i386 > > Reviews contain the explanations. For xlint it is just an overdue, IMO. > While for XBOX I do not have much opposition against supporting the > obsoleted platforms, but the way the port was done pollutes the sources > with too much #ifdefs. Since people often do not want to care about i386 > together with amd64, additional hurdle only makes the things worse. > > Feel free to add yourself as reviewer. I intend to commit the patches > in a week, unless strong objections expressed by the time. -- Ed Schouten Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands