From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 21 14:50:24 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CC5106567A;
	Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:50:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:2f0:104:80a0:230:48ff:fe41:2455])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407F88FC1E;
	Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:50:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from nadesico.ninth-nine.com (nadesico.ninth-nine.com
	[219.127.74.122]) by sakura.ninth-nine.com
	(8.14.1/8.14.1/NinthNine) with SMTP id m9LEoMfp012729;
	Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:50:22 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:50:21 +0900
From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
To: pyunyh@gmail.com
Message-Id: <20081021235021.87df3b16.nork@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081020185356.c6eb46fe.nork@FreeBSD.org>
References: <755632516.20081018001504@rulez.sk>
	<20081018020248.GB31303@cdnetworks.co.kr>
	<20081020012504.95adc0ca.nork@FreeBSD.org>
	<20081020071155.GH38923@cdnetworks.co.kr>
	<20081020185356.c6eb46fe.nork@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2
	(sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.121]);
	Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:50:23 +0900 (JST)
Cc: Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org>, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>,
	stable@FreeBSD.org, yongari@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: re0 problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:50:24 -0000

Hi Pyun!

	Sorry, I am wrong in my reported case.

On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:53:56 +0900
Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > Hmm, that's odd. I don't think there is significant change of re(4)
> > in that time window. Would you show me the revision number of
> > if_re.c of old current?
> 	Sorry, I'll try to trace the changes.

	I tried to build&run kernels, 20080701, 20080801, 20080815,
	20080901 and 20081001.  I got same result on all case.

> > What I wonder is why re(4) is child device of pci3 on recent
> > CURRENT whereas re(4) used to be a child device of cardbus0. Maybe
> > imp@ know more details on this. There was a change in pccbb(4).
> 	The latest current is my new note which has ExpressCard slot.
> 	So I used&confirmed ExpressCard-to-Cardbus Bridge(TI XIO2000
> 	PCIe-to-PCI Bridge).

	takawata@ teached me that Cardbus NICs get MAC address from CIS
	(Card Information Structure).  But my bridge is just PCIe-PCI
	bridge, so it doesn't have CIS.