From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 18:13:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACC816A401 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C698813C4D3 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id m1NIDDp9034165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:13:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id m1NIDDEs034164; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:13:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA28858; Sat, 23 Feb 08 10:03:21 PST Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:58:22 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: kamikaze@bsdforen.de Message-Id: <47c05ebe.Mgeup+ojPdtp/pFj%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <47be74b1.pGW9HajDXl3VC5wx%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <200802221307.43940.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47bfd2d6.EvwzDqmqdVQnRjs8%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <47BFD6D1.3020506@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <47BFD6D1.3020506@bsdforen.de> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting X11BASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:13:17 -0000 > >>> * What is the value of LOCALBASE? I'm not finding any > >>> definition, or other reference, in /etc/make.conf. > >> > >> Just set it to ${LOCALBASE} verbatim. Not what you think is the > >> value of the variable LOCALBASE but the word ${LOCALBASE}. > > > > Academic interest :) > > > > I'm finding it especially "interesting" that /etc/make.conf, > > which to judge from its location is part of the base, depends > > on a setting from something in the /usr/ports tree. > > Well, actually it doesn't. What gives you this impression? Paul Schmehl reported where LOCALBASE is set: in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk Now I'm being told to add this: X11BASE=${LOCALBASE} to /etc/make.conf, so that /etc/make.conf needs LOCALBASE to be set in order to set X11BASE correctly. Is that not a dependency?