Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:01:04 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 253882] x11-wm/Motif Message-ID: <bug-253882-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D253882 Bug ID: 253882 Summary: x11-wm/Motif Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: johndhend@icloud.com https://github.com/johndhend/Motif I belive is ready to become a NEW port. I ask for advice on "what would be best for the port team" or for them to a= dd it into upcoming release intitially so I can work from that point on (responding to complaints before release). The handbook asks I not "submitt a whole tarball as an svn .diff" to bugzil= la (and a diff cannot be made because x11-wm/Motif does not exist). POINT: it is not even thinkable as a .diff to redhat motif - this is for freeBSD, not a linux port. WHY: Motif (motif-2.5.0) is a pure freeBSD comp= ile (amd64/any) of ~ 2.2.3 with many things fixed still broken in x11-toolkits/openmotif-2.3.8 by redhat (which is autoconf and doesn't compi= le correcly like it says it does, is controlled by redhat not freeBSD, breaks imake other dire things, requires GNU new depends 2.5.0 has 0). Made my PO= INT: way different. The source, NEWS, pkg-descr is on github, I won't jam you = with advertising here. NEW PORT ERRATA: I could but do not asks for gpg key and mentor rights to alter the svn tree to add a node or for svn up submittal. I don't want to = be more complicated than the ports team have request me to be. I want to keep= it simple. This is my very first freebsd bugzilla posting. I may not know all the rul= es yet. Thanks sorry for boring you with details if I did! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-253882-7788>