From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 21 02:00:35 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33910106566C;
	Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:00:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com (mail-ew0-f209.google.com
	[209.85.219.209])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6918FC15;
	Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:00:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so2815618ewy.36
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=UsbkFJUujrE+r30Nrvhccr6JQLWRDd3pVt8pIqcwXoc=;
	b=cZfoATp+P907PVpdj6XEyPd713noFUQB0sat8/h5g4WKWojjaGfomsQWjOqNmsFxjK
	lgi0gR2h8jAMHh70ohZPgQNFGAff1VOxIyxU8qvRzdMWf5AsuObm1SHRwrbAUashfL7q
	leD5Jz4qif4NAJrrSEKgp1JG3DDl7Q8cXF/ZM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=bXFA2tuQIU6fLSJaHgQktIpnn+ylF6x7KHPrX5FJsQ3NJubtZa5y+0JkpCFALYLh8X
	oUmqejZHio+uGmG16vWWT4ZRtl/y1/JEh/iN1jZlNazM6aT90y9i2WofjTUKwHHLXbJ5
	IqjYlZxxwk+Z26fgjd/IHkydvwSeQU6IpU7NM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.93.6 with SMTP id k6mr2404052wef.89.1256090433280; Tue, 20 
	Oct 2009 19:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <bc2d970910201734o332582ceic30fb7e42e14c812@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d873d5be0910201621h768e126dq34df38c07b83fe47@mail.gmail.com>
	<bc2d970910201734o332582ceic30fb7e42e14c812@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:00:33 +0000
Message-ID: <d873d5be0910201900w67833e83kf53b556e2b5c8d00@mail.gmail.com>
From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
To: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: qingli@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r198306 - head/sys/net
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:00:35 -0000

On 10/21/09, Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> wrote:
> On non-SMP kernels there's only one CPU, so there's no point in
> binding a thread to a CPU.
>

If that is all that is intended here, then it does not seem that it
should be done at all on non-SMP, but rather that it should be made
conditional on #ifdef SMP.

b.