From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 23 14:17:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D3010656B8; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.vnode.se (mail.vnode.se [62.119.52.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576108FC14; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.vnode.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25A9E3F07A; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:57:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vnode.se Received: from mail.vnode.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.vnode.se (mail.vnode.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YdOufu-MoIkI; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:57:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from pluto.vnode.local (unknown [83.223.1.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A51D4E3F079; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:57:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:57:44 +0100 From: Joel Dahl To: Ivan Voras Message-ID: <20101123135744.GE12322@pluto.vnode.local> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em driver, 82574L chip, and possibly ASPM X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:17:47 -0000 On 23-11-2010 13:47, Ivan Voras wrote: > It looks like I'm unfortunate enough to have to deploy on a machine > which has the 82574L Intel NIC chip on a Supermicro X8SIE-F board, which > apparently has hardware issues, according to this thread: I have a Supermicro X7SPE-HF board with two onboard Intel 82574L nics and I see the same thing. The nics seem to "die" if I push enough data through them and the only way to recover is to reboot. I noticed this a few days ago and I haven't had any time to investigate more, so I guess this is just a "me too"... -- Joel