From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 09:46:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C8C16A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:46:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from out011.verizon.net (out011pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2629443D41 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:46:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.org) Received: from keyslapper.org ([151.203.104.18]) by out011.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040319174617.DUQY18566.out011.verizon.net@keyslapper.org> for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:46:17 -0600 Received: from keyslapper.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keyslapper.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2JHkJWU073631 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:46:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.org) Received: (from leblanc@localhost) by keyslapper.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id i2JHkIDP073630 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:46:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:46:18 -0500 From: Louis LeBlanc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040319174618.GH64130@keyslapper.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040319172130.GB2044@cs025_2k> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20040319172130.GB2044@cs025_2k> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out011.verizon.net from [151.203.104.18] at Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:46:17 -0600 Subject: Re: Top posting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:46:20 -0000 On 03/19/04 09:21 AM, Joshua Lokken sat at the `puter and typed: > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=rfc+top+posting&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 > > > > Wow, almost every single reply to the list today was top posted. > People, please know (and you must, you have to read them, too) > that posting replies to the top of an email is, well, counter- > intuitive, hard to follow, and goes against the general grain of > RFC 1855. Please, it has been requested from many users of this > list, do not top post replies, but don't stop sending them ;) Yes, it has been requested from many users, and quite a few have flat out refused to follow this logical norm. Others simply follow the precedent set in any given thread, and some few will go so far as to delete the trailing messages and try to herd an already errant thread in the right direction. For my part, my reply behavior depends on the audience. One would think that a company with so many geeks (from developers to SW architects) would tend to do this right, but not so. Bottom line, don't hold your breath. Unfortunately, many mail clients don't show the replied email during reply composition but place it below the response, and most default to replying at the top anyway. Most users just don't bother to correct it when the option is there. I feel your pain dude. Lou -- Louis LeBlanc leblanc@keyslapper.org Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ Power corrupts. And atomic power corrupts atomically.