From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Dec 6 14:44:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A4599ABC7 for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:44:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE3D81F9F for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so120702302wme.1 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 06:44:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=UoCWsDfWjiZYyf+XxBlbUpvQW0e8m8JGtRiSY/NQVOE=; b=aPorp4p3enkjKyf45unLN1VUOsbmHsz2F5T1yvxKEpxfCtmBkWZBkSRBpVEw2mditJ uE5aMPsNVKqhxwnu7VcRXGOE8TMCmT+d+J8MIFUhS+qVY1L9eq6onB+P083QzPN44dG/ zv+nzjHUPrtHEpXMdoMRUCJgMpNOpudoJBv6n4CZXp0xuSHRvVCx/OV/4lIVkkoOINp8 N/h/a3kSQCBAo3vBSfybJaLL+86TTKlyKUgm5nOOe9WcuU7mn9xEeoQO1s+evYE263kK j6ZMRDjPUJKDBGVQpG3iSeNXQfyECPM89DvsmwsIq+JNDT/5opdTFWMESs9DV1yZO8En yRSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=UoCWsDfWjiZYyf+XxBlbUpvQW0e8m8JGtRiSY/NQVOE=; b=ajm+l6bv0DCmg/Xt1K8n17L514v2q4oX5A3fXvx4DifP+SpkcQRH4XhT5ML4eIPkh9 mXJl8SHYt1U9hx7ytiQly3s6c13x8N9jj9zjnaJ3wV/Z0d5Y21CKVQCYq9CF8GlRVMbH emPmHMtcMnhlD0JIZNeogRL7rJY5mtC2peSzEAdQXZgfJDUDwOJAvtTDq5OrWxtfYhMB aIOHU+kRZB9CnAuo9Cg8etzMZiXU15w8d8EAAYESLIvjcXd4ExBzTvFHhwijBBj+NDc2 BeM+gHjWbLBP0kkIJVeNniQLOcSzdyh5IhjIU/CZT4RcwVQkJQCC0JFDHZZNn1ECIz0Q hUFA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmNZjofZGx7hkC1yk4qcx+Hw33foQDbsa2rID5oGs3sJJZ/D4aJIGvWbCr3aJPBaC80uVZpV+2NgRRg4TfVSQSo2XYZwg== X-Received: by 10.28.156.75 with SMTP id f72mr16427545wme.91.1449413066792; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 06:44:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z17sm20945494wjq.1.2015.12.06.06.44.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Dec 2015 06:44:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 06:44:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:44:25 GMT Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tB6EiPlU041205; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:44:25 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id tB6EiPmm041204; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:44:25 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201512061444.tB6EiPmm041204@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: adrian@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, hps@selasky.org, mexas@bris.ac.uk Subject: Re: urtwn regression(?) from 10.2 to current r291431 Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <5664472E.3090601@selasky.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:44:29 -0000 >From hps@selasky.org Sun Dec 6 14:41:27 2015 > >On 12/06/15 15:14, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> I posted this about a week ago: >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-November/058683.html >> >> The problem is that urtwn stopped >> working in current r291431. >> >> I did more testing with the same revision, >> and sometimes it would work, but extremely >> slowly, and sometimes seemingly associate >> but get an address of 0.0.0.0. >> >> I now installed 10.2-RELEASE-p8 and >> the urtwn works fine, no issues at all. >> >> Does this look like a bug at some recent >> current revision? Should I file a PR? >> >> I's just I recall there have been major >> chages to wlan, so perphaps I'm forgetting >> to change the config in recent current? >> >> Please advise >> >> Anton > >Hi, > >There is work ongoing in the WLAN drivers. Did you try the latest -current? > >--HPS r291431 was about a week ago. Will try latest -current later today. Anton