From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 21:36:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE02816A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:36:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from vette.gigo.com (vette.gigo.com [216.218.228.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4738143D3C for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:36:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfesler@gigo.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.gigo.com [127.0.0.1]) by vette.gigo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB1EA8DB; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:35:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 21:35:25 -0800 (PST) From: Jason Fesler To: Wolfpaw - Dale Corse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20031211213245.I61349@vette.gigo.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: RE: djbdns X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 05:36:45 -0000 > How does djbdns measure up to bind anyway? Bind works wonderfully > for us.. any reasons someone can come up with (other then the beaten > to deal security arguments) why a person should change over? If you are happy with bind; If you stay current on bind security problems; If you find the ISC to be hoopy froods and DJB to be, well, DJB; then focus your attention to more fruitful efforts. Really. --jason (a die hard djbdns user, who fears bind to death, but not an evangelist)